Can a C Corporation Buy a Residential Property? 3 Reasons to Think Twice

I once joked, “If you decide to put your personal residence into a C corporation, you must really have it out for yourself.” It’s harsh, sure—but not entirely off base.

So, Can a C Corporation Own Residential Real Estate?

Technically, yes. A C corporation can own residential property as a separate entity from its owners. This means the corporation, not the individual owner, owns the property. To purchase property through a corporation, the corporation itself completes the transaction as a legal entity. But just because it can doesn’t mean it should. Real estate investors need to understand the potential tax minefield they might be walking into. The biggest issue? Double taxation. When the property is sold, the corporation pays taxes on the gains. Then, when those profits are distributed to shareholders, they’re taxed again as dividends. That’s two layers of taxes that could severely erode your returns—especially when compared to pass-through entities like LLCs or S corporations.

This isn’t just a theoretical problem. The difference between the property’s original tax basis and its fair market value at sale or transfer can trigger a substantial tax hit. For most investors, the disadvantages far outweigh any benefit. The corporate structure means the corporation, as the owner, is taxed separately from its shareholders, which can complicate ownership and tax implications. Always loop in a tax advisor before choosing how to hold your real estate—this is one area where expert advice can save you serious money and stress.

As some seasoned investors like to say: “Never hold real estate in a C corporation… and fire the advisor who suggests it.”

Now, if you’re wondering why the C corporation structure is so frowned upon for real estate, let’s break it down into three clear reasons.

Reason #1: You’ll Likely Pay Higher Capital Gains Taxes

This is the biggest red flag. C corporations face double taxation: first, any gain from the sale of appreciated real estate is taxed at the corporate level using the corporate tax rate, and then again when profits are distributed as dividends to shareholders. The tax consequences of selling appreciated real estate within a C corporation can be significant, as both the corporation and the individual taxpayer are taxed, reducing the after-tax profit.

Compared to an LLC or an S corporation, which are considered pass through entity structures (where income and gain are reported directly on the owner's personal tax return), a C corporation’s structure can leave you with a much larger tax bill. From a tax perspective, most real estate investors avoid C corporations for tax reasons, as the double taxation and unfavorable tax treatment can erode returns. In short, if you want to keep more of your profit as a taxpayer, and minimize the tax consequences on your gain, skip the C corp.

Reason #2: Asset Protection Isn’t as Strong as You Think

Some investors assume that incorporating automatically boosts their asset protection. That’s only half true. While a C corporation is a separate legal entity, your ownership of it (i.e., your shares) can be vulnerable. If someone sues you personally, a judgment creditor might be able to seize your shares—especially in states with weaker protections—making your shares subject to claims by creditors. Once they control your shares, they can effectively control the company and its assets, since the corporation is the legal owner of the property, not the individual. Compare this to LLCs formed in Nevada or Wyoming, where property is owned by the entity rather than the individual, offering stronger barriers against personal creditors. If asset protection is a priority—and for real estate investors, it should be—you’re better off with an LLC or a limited partnership. As a shareholder, you have control over the corporation and its assets, which can also play a significant role in estate planning and asset protection strategies.

Reason #3: Getting Property Out of a Corporation Is a Taxable Event

Another pitfall? Once real estate is inside a C (or even an S) corporation, it’s difficult—and expensive—to get it back out. There is one exception where transferring property out of a corporation does not trigger immediate gain, but it is rare and only applies under specific control conditions. The IRS treats the transfer of appreciated real estate from a corporation to an individual as a taxable event. That means you could have to pay tax on unrealized gains, even if no money changed hands. The tax consequences of transferring or selling property out of a corporation can be significant, and if you want to sell the property from the corporation, you may face double taxation or other complications. In contrast, the same property held in an LLC or LP can generally be distributed to owners without triggering immediate taxes. If your long-term strategy involves flexibility or asset restructuring, the C corporation structure is a trap.

There Are Better Ways to Structure Real Estate Ownership

If you’re thinking about using your corporation to buy or hold real property, proceed with caution. You’ll need enough cash in the corporation to complete the purchase, and you should prepare for the cost of setting up and maintaining the corporate structure—this includes legal fees, accounting expenses, and more. It’s important to consult an attorney for legal advice on structuring real property ownership. A smarter move might be setting up a separate LLC to hold the house or other real property and having your corporation lease space from that LLC. In this scenario, the corporation pays rent, which is a tax deduction for the business, and you collect that income under a more favorable structure—potentially offset by expenses and depreciation.

Keep in mind, a property owned by a corporation does not qualify as a principal residence for tax exemption purposes. Using a corporation or LLC to hold real property can make sense in certain business or investment situations, such as when liability protection or estate planning is a priority, but may not be optimal for personal use or when seeking principal residence tax benefits.

In the end, real property ownership is too significant an investment to get tripped up by avoidable tax and legal complications. Talk to professionals, weigh your options carefully, and remember: just because a structure is legal doesn’t make it optimal.

For a deeper dive into tax-smart strategies and asset protection, check out my book Loopholes of Real Estate—it’ll give you the playbook most investors wish they had before buying their first property.

‍